>>48566102>The order that the fire fighters came out matters now? What if Emboar came before them with an identical design? Everyone would hate infernape. Uh no. Because Infernape would actually
still be a much more interesting and useful pokemon. There is nothing notable about Emboar, besides it looking fat and ugly.
>Objectively, ignoring release date, Emboar has the most creative design.How exactly? It's a fat ugly pig that looks like a guy in a fatsuit. I suppose that's the peak of creativity for pea brains like you though
>Every other fire starter’s more humanoidUh no? Most of the pre Gen 5 fire starters weren't humanoid.
>Less cluttered than most other fire starters and the themes doesn’t hijak the fucking design. You see an animalistic monster before whatever fucking job it isIt's not less cluttered at all, it's equally cluttered as the later starter designs. The ugly swirls and stripes, the weird arms, the weird body proportions etc.
>It can standDoesn't change the fact that it looks awkward as fuck.
>They go into the flap of skin that’s behind the scabbards, because the scabbards are part of its body. Nothing’s growing or shrinking, and even if it was, it’s fucking Pokémon. Fucking Arceus and eternatus can fit in your pocket.You're comparing things that aren't even relevant. Being able to put Arceus or Eternatus in your pocket isn't a flaw of their respective designs, that's literally how capturing Pokémon works. While the way Samurott uses it's swords directly clashes with its inspirations and just makes it look very clunky
>Is basedOn shit
>The narrative that starters went downhill at gen 5 and not at gen 6 is false and desperately needs to be retired, but everyone knows this is /vp/.Jesus if you wanted to defend the starters, maybe you could've tried not to be so fucking disingenuous and use actual arguments instead of deflecting. I don't even hate Gen 5 like the discordtranny but this is embarrassing
