>>48570438This is just a redrawing of Croagunk in what this artist perceives as each generation's artstyle. Obviously these are all exaggerated to prove a point and Gen 8 got the brunt of that bias but...
>Gen 1 is the poster child for blackface. . . What?
No, WHAT?
What the FUCK Do you mean by this!? Also Gen 5 being "controversial somehow" is more about how the community feels that Gen 5's designs either suck or don't, and there's rarely ever a middle ground reached. ALSO
>Gen 5 the poster child for stump feet... blah blah blah other generations do itBecause they didn't have 156 new fucking Pokemon with stump feet, that's why.
>Why is Gen 4 not fat?Because the ORIGINAL Croagunk isn't fat. The one shown here is close to, if not entirely, on model.
>KalospermYou learn a new insult every day.
>Doubling down on UBs or... whatever that isSo Croagunk is a pseudo-legendary now, is that it? Is that REALLY the position you want to die on?
>GreninjaOther Pokemon went into consideration for this, Froakie's. I know this because Seismitoad doesn't have stumpy feet, and yet Gen 5's consideration was all the other Pokemon where stubby feet were introduced.
>>48570440Gen 8 is not that bad, but it sure up there in "what the fuck" factor. It just feels like a parody, when it really didn't need to be because there's so many more trends he could've capitalized on.
