>>48731139>If they intended me to use more than one Pokemon but the better and more obvious strategy is to just use one Pokemon then the game is broken.It's not broken, it's fundamentally flawed. If it were broken then the game would be impossible to beat training more than just one Pokémon.
I never argued that using only one Pokémon is wrong, but it's clearly not the intended method. If the game goes out of its way to tell you to use more than one (when it could just not do that) and forces you to catch more Pokémon to progress, then it's clearly the intended method. Whether that method is good or not is debatable. However, as I said here (
>>48725547) that debate is pointless because the money says otherwise, regardless of what a vocal minority on social media says.
