>>48742063>You're the one just flat out denying whole claims ...yes? becuase the claims are false? Am I supposed to accept everything I read on the Internet?
Also, what does have to do with revisionism. Revisionism is making claims about what happened. Denying claims in general doesn't make you revisionist. You really need to learn to read anon.
>When you started demonizing potential buyersWhen?
>Joe doesn't support the dexcut. Sure, because words matter more than actions right?
>I told you my issue has less to do with their message and more to do with them being communist chimpsHow is it communist to want more mons in the game?
>Should I show comments of people getting attacked over buying the games or you attacking Joe since you brought it up?Joe's not a neutral so attacking him wouldn't prove your point at all, so the first.
>No one is pro-cut though.Ok then, why attack BBND? How is Joe not pro-cut when he consistently attacked BBND and made up accusations about them without proof yet he didn't say shit to the other side he was suposedly not in?
>You're just trying to shidtcthe subject over to me when we were talking about BBNDer misinformation.And easily suceeding it seems given not only I gave you what you wanted and you ignored it but keep on this line of arguing.
>What delusions?That BBND harassed, made death threats and attacked neutrals, which are the thing we're discussing, which you would know if you knew how to read.
