>>48994476Do you honestly believe that the lack of fire types is the only problem? Half of the new cross gen evos and their pre evolved forms were locked behind post game for one. Or are you sincerely defending only having two fully evolved fire types?
>muh wurmpleNext youre going to say
>hur dur its le cold region why would ther be fire types lmoaEven though two of the new ICE types introduced in gen 4 arent in the SNOW COVERED areas and are once again locked behind the elite 4?
>>48994486>>48994491I hope youre not trying to get me to defend gen 5 because I physically cannot. Gens 1-3 were good classic pokemon, gen 4 was a bloated drifting corpse, gen 5 was a weird failed clone of pokemon. Gens 6 and 7 were okay, so radically different in so many ways from classic pokemon and no doubt imperfect and incomplete, but better than 4 or 5.
Gen 8? Couldnt tell ya never played it.
