>>49061235I noticed while making this you actually could make multiple conflicting personality types out of just one Type, and it would be more accurate. Y'know, WHY a Type is being chosen actually matters. Like for Poison, you could say it represents you because you are like a ninja, or like a viscious snake, or you like super gross nasty things, or you're hedonistic and have toxic habits, or because you're patient etc.....
All of these are valid interpretations of a "poison" personality, but they are conflicting/distinct from one another. What I tried to do making this is just create the most basic interpretation that makes sense widely. For example I used to have "insidious" under Poison which is fucking perfect, because that word means "causing harm gradually over time" exactly like a poison. But I didn't want people reading this to literally have to be cartoon villain evil to make it into Poison, so I used Impure as a broader word. Impure can mean morally wicked but could also mean someone with nasty habits etc. I tried to generalize.
>>49061259Thx hun. I decided it was okay to use accurate, but somewhat obscure words, under the understanding that people probably WON'T look most of them up. Hence it shouldn't actually inconvenience them.
Chances are, if you don't CARE about a specific Type you won't bother to look up the word, which is fine, because the chances are high that that word won't apply to you anyway, so you don't really need to know it. I had to balance tho, I threw out a lot of words for being too flowery despite being technically accurate.
