>>49137802>You basically rephrased the same statement without any particular evidence.the fact that they could have stopped anywhere else in latin america if they just wanted to be safe and once in the usa they demand free shit. I'm not talking about historic people who came here pre WWI who came to a developing country and built it. I am talking about fags who run to a developed nation and then try to get on welfare
>>49137805Vietnam stopped being full commie in the mid 80s. There is a mcdonalds in fucking saigon. Immediately after the war tens of thousands of vietnamese died in their "reeducation" camps and famines and on boats trying to escape.
>>49137823We abolished slavery 150 years ago dude. Meanwhile, leftists still demand the ability to own humans as slaves
>>49137831>government incompetence to start,weird how all communists are incompetent
>fox news tier meme,so those vietnamese people didn't die?
>one of the single most based events of the 20th century, couple of the lads rock up in the mountains and overthrow a central government, later become cringe by siding with the soviets, che dies heartbrokenand the people there are starving and flee on rafts to the USA because life in cuba is so shitty
>what happens when you’re entire economy is based on oil, and one of the biggest importers the world suddenly sanctions it?why is it the responsibility of capitalists to fun communism? Why can't communism run without demanding gold from capitalist nations?
>anon I hate to break it to you but all of those scenarios are not inherently communist, it’s just incompetence mixed with economic sanctions,why are commies so incompetent and why do commies rely on capitalist's to live, but capitalists don't worry about commie sanctions?
> there are plenty of examples of why authoritarian (in this case commie) governments are cuntscommies are inherently authoritarian,
also weird as fuck all the examples of communism show it failing
