>>49376157The fact that not only don't we constantly have a showderp thread up, but the last two showderp threads in the archive are days apart and have 30 and 2 (!) replies respectively.
>>49376129Dang. Such a shame. I mean, I haven't actively participated in a few years since I kinda lost interest in Pokemon, but every now and again I sneak back to /vp/ on the off chance to have some fun on showderp.
Can't really replicate the kind of fun you had with showderp. Oh well.