>>49521007>It's literally not implied there at all.Sure, you literally saying something does not imply that at all!
>as though they have the same meaningThey do though.
If "the flow of time being ambiguous" is not how the games are placed to each other then what do you mean by "the flow of time"? What is ambiguous? The time between games? There's literal evidence of the opposite and you aren't providing the evidence asked.
>Characters TPC would rather not have get old greatly benefit from a timeline that is ambiguous. Exactly. If they do get old(and thus that becomes a problem to tackle) it means there IS a non-ambiguous timeline.
>Which is alleviated by the timeline being ambiguous. Then they wouldn't need to solve that problem nigga.
>Please google "Elapsed time is a secret. Imagine freely!" he's replying to a guy named @d_kaleo82Only got a dead link and an archive /vp/ thread when a dude repeats the same thing. Please provide your evidence.
>That pic is just a visual to give people a general understanding of what he's saying. That'd be the case if the pic said the same thing the guy said in the tweet.
>Saying it's specifically FRLG or RGBY is splitting hairsIt really isn't. In fact a big misinfo narrative circling around is that the original Gen 1 and 2 games are isolated from the rest despite this being actual confirmation of this not being the case, BUT the pic being used to mislead people.
Weird you don't know this common discourse but do know about the timeline.
>Why do you keep arguing against a person who does not exist?Ok, if there is a timeline, and its not ambiguous then, again, what IS ambiguous?
