>>49602147If anything this shows that people on /vp/ have no idea how to express any sort of criticism without going to extremes.
>Pokemon doesn't need good graphicsNo, graphics don't matter as much as people claim they do, ultimately it's all about the gameplay, but when you claim that you're cutting Pokemon from a Pokemon game for the sake of improving them, then the game better be pretty. This claim was made about SWSH, not about Legends.
>The designs are badDesigns are entirely subjective, I've met people who love Pokemon I hate it's not that big of a deal.
>I bet he defends the Battle Frontier being removedPokemon Legends doesn't have a Battle Frontier because the game's focus is on catching Pokemon, the battle mechanics themselves are unpolished and need refinement in sequels just like the original which took a fucking decade to reach what is pretty much the perfected version of the formula that's been used for nearly 20 years now.
>Imagine defending less contentThe game lacking content that isn't entirely focused on catching Pokemon is a legitimate criticism.
People don't hate SWSH because everyone collectively drank some magic potion that changed their perception of what a good or fun game is, people hate SWSH because it was a rushed out and stale pile of shit. Cope, seethe and dilate.