>>49830157Please cease this line of thinking. This is a much milder form of appropriation of the past to make some inane point, much much milder than the *invented* past nationalists, racists and other right wing groups use to push a *racist* agenda. In the case an internet subculture trying to legitimize themselves by taking things out of context and appropriating them. No, ancient people didn't see those figures the same way some of you do, they were serious in the worship of those beings. To them it was no different than worshipping Zeus or other gods, they didn't see them as being "furries" or whatever nonsense you want to imply, there's a very rich history there and trying to reduce it as being fetish material is inane.
