>>49908442>When I was looking at the ceiling in a private room while receiving IV drip without having a conversation with the nurses, what naturally came to my mind was "What is the world I am in?" Only humans and Pokemon appear in "Pokemon". At the beginning of the broadcast, real animals other than Pokemon appeared in a glance, but because of poor communication with the drawing relationship, the only animals in the Pokemon world are originally Pokemon and humans.
Instead, Pokémon include plant-based Pokémon, mineral-based Pokémon, and even Hedro-based (?) Pokémon.
This area is the skill of game makers, but I created a group of animals called Pokemon by skillfully arranging familiar things and creatures that we are familiar with. Each design, ability, and personality at the time of battle are rich in variety, and you can find a Pokemon that suits the player's taste. In addition, it adds an element of "nurturing" that if the ability improves, it will evolve into another Pokemon of the same species.
>Why are there no animals other than Pokemon?>In short, it was a roundabout story, but it was a little glimpse of "What is a world where animals are only Pokemon and humans?"Source:
http://www.style.fm/as/05_column/shudo209.shtmlThat's shudo blog, and a crappy translation by Google but it does show that he clearly refers to Pokémon as animals hence why the distinction between *real* animals and Pokémon are made. Because Pokémon are not *real* animals but *fictional* animals which Shudo here, and the guidebook from TPC, makes pretty clear. This is why both use the term "real animal" rather than just animal, because Pokémon fall under the concept of what an animal is. Even the rough google translation gets that point across, Pokémon were designed to be both *fictional* animals and monsters.
