>>49990319>using a chart with easily disproved lies does not make for good argumentsand that's exactly why I'm showing how you didn't actually disprove anything
>bases were in gen 3fair, but the rest that was removed had MORE than enough replacements exclusive to Unova, which in my opinion accounts for secret bases as well
>You can't even keep your own comments straight.Dude, what? I have maintained this entire time that neither is really humanoid, while you claim Emboar is more. I am countering that, not by saying Typh is more humanoid (which I said literally nowhere) but rather that it isn't true and that both aren't really humanoid.
>Saying it's okay that Unova did it because later regions did it is not a good argument.Why do I have to say this again? That's not the point. The point is that when Unova did it, it wasn't actually bad because decreasing the team size didn't decrease the difficulty in Unova's case. Thus, it isn't an actual negative of Unova.
>assumes the image meant "kids" when saying Unova buyers were new>assumes Unova posters are retard"Just admit you're not arguing out of principle like you said but rather because you dislike Unova. You've been pretending that your only intention is "I'm impartial when saying these arguments are weak" but it's clear as crystal that you have bias when saying such claims.
That ties in well with your next point about the image implying Zard is more humanoid that Emboar, which I happen to disagree with. I do think Charizard looks less like a human than Emboar does. My only point currently is that you're saying the image doesn't work as a Unova defense, while I think it's pretty logical, even if I subjectively disagree with that one opinion. I think it's already a stretch to take the three fire starters that aren't humanoid (zard, typh, and boar) and try to rank their humanoid-ness because that already becomes severely subjective
