>>50276403In case you're being honest, I'll spoon feed you:
>It's just that you have to proveI don't have to prove anything.
You literally used a logical fallacy, ad populum, and imply that because something is popular it necessarily has some intrinsic quality what isn't only obviously FALSE but also, most of the time, the extreme opposite, with the vast majority of popular things being low quality
This is all I'm saying
"sales=/=quality"
"popularity=/=quality"
literally means that
sales is different from quality
popularity is different from quality
In other words, if it isn't obvious enough, sales don't necessarily reflect quality
If it isn't obvious enough, popularity doesn't necessarily reflect quality
So your first statement was false
