>>50432587>Every pokemon being different is goodYes, when did you see me state the opposite? Did you somehow think that the only way pokemon can be different from each other is if they are good or bad in battles?
>Every type has good and bad pokemonYes but what does this have to do with anything I said.I'm arguing in favor of better changes. Trying to balance a type by giving out broken moves and abilities to a select mons only fix some mons but not the ones that don't get anything, this is why type chart fixes are better because they affect the whole type and don't leave out some mons. How is this hard to understand.
>which is goodExplain why, and don't bring the debunked argument that "difference is good" because pokemon can be good in different ways.If you are arguing that NFE mons should be weaker than FE mons then yes I agree.
>There will always be a type that has a better amount of good and bad matchups. There is a world of difference between a reality where the worst type has a disproportionately huge amount of bad matchups tht makes it so much worse than the others and one where the worst type only has slightly less bad matchup ups in a way that even if said type is the worst type, it's not that much worse from the others.
I will agree with you that type changes aren't everything and should be followed by move distribution changes. As an example, bug has literally no strong physical stab aside from megahorn which has a limited distribution.
