>>50511091iirc it was just extremely repetitive and filled with obnoxious shit takes/opinions being presented as facts, takes that were
clearly nostalgia-biased, and opinions that were conflicting with his other opinions too, which kind of defeats the idea of acting like any of it is objective.
There was also a lot of nitpicking tiny things in the way every edgy YT reviewer/commentator does, like "C'mon Nintendo, why can't I just pick up BOTH fossils?! What were they thinking!?!?" And other shitty meme nitpicks that don't matter in the slightest.
Also a lot of "Why is pokemon easy when I'm an adult?" complaints I'm pretty sure. Most of the video felt like it was made by someone who watched comedy review channels and wanted to copy that but didn't understand when something is an actual complaint vs a joke nitpick so he just either hates what the game puts in front of him, or thinks its clever and nice if it's basic and inoffensive enough for him to understand and simultaneously not be able nitpick.
I watched it sped up a long time ago and don't remember much of what we as said specifically but I remember that being what I thought of the video at the time, at least.
I think I remember him praising gen 2 designs and shitting on gen 5 designs which is hilarious to think that has any objective merit and isn't just nostalgia talking, but I don't remember what pokemon he was talking about anyway so it's whatever to me.
Either way it's another sign that it's just a video product of the era he grew up in and what anyone with his biases would think, and not really a good objective criticism of the game.
