>>50637827>every study done on the matter failing to link homosexual behavior with geneticshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8494487/"Twin pairs in which at least one twin is homosexual were solicited through announcements in the gay press and personal referrals from 1980 to the present. An 18-page questionnaire on the "sexuality of twins" was filled out by one or both twins. Thirty-eight pairs of monozygotic twins (34 male pairs and 4 female pairs) were found to have a concordance rate of 65.8% for homosexual orientation. Twenty-three pairs of dizygotic twins were found to have a concordance rate of 30.4% for homosexual orientation. In addition, three sets of triplets were obtained. Two sets contained a pair of monozygotic twins concordant for sexual orientation with the third triplet dizygotic and discordant for homosexual orientation. A third triplet set was monozygotic with all three concordant for homosexual orientation. These findings are interpreted as supporting the argument for a biological basis in sexual orientation."
OHNONONO we got too cocky homophobe bros!! Also, why the fuck do you think people in Saudi Arabia "choose" to be gay, or Alan Turing did? I'm sure that he would have loved to have not been chemically castrated. Or better yet, why don't you try actually talking to some gay people about whether or not they are capable of experiencing attraction to women? Or talk to some straight men about whether they could come to enjoy fucking dudes, if they really put their minds to it? You might be suprised by the answers you get.
