>>50681485>we want to make a fire/fighter but people will get upset we did it again so we'll use a flimsy excuse to have it be dark instead>what about the fire?>fuck you it's the heat of the crowdfixed that again for you, you retard
you're assuming a lot here by saying that me merely rejecting gamefreak's fourth fire/"fighter" means I MUST want a cat that's on fire then instead, shows how creative you are when you literally cannot conceive of a concept beyond what gamefreak pukes out for you but will use a whole lot of brainpower to excuse it.
>>50681488repeating it again won't make it true, you haven't made an argument, nothing is "supposed" to be anything, it just IS that way, and we can asses whether or not the thing it is is shit or not based on its merits/demerits. Here's that argument thrown back at you for a pokemon I don't even like to show you how dumb of a take it is:
>incineroar is supposed to be a cat but it's standing on two legs in a wrestler getup, therefore it's shitThe "argument" forces you to pick and choose traits something is "supposed" to be, meaning you either pick all of them, and discuss their merits on their own, or you're an infantile emotional litle turd where you've deemed what something is "supposed" to be and everyone else is wrong
