>>50706198>Of course all pokemon is betterWhat? But shills said fewer pokémon was better. Get your mind, cocksuckers.
>but children don't care about catching 900 monstersYet they added all of them in SM. Your point? If that's the case, little childrens don't care about curry dex and they DID added that irrelevant shit.
Little kids ALSO DON'T CARE ABOUT NOSTALGIA PANDERING, yet they forced it in every single part of the newer games, so this prove the games isn't only "for little kids", so stop using that excuse.
>there are games with less pokemon with better features compared to games with all pokemons, such as LGPE and PLAThat's why I don't mind about the cut in these games. But Gamefreak promised BETTER AND MORE animations and NEW models... and they LIED.
>Cutting pokemon wasn't a mistakeFor Galar, yes, it was.
>using that shit excuse wasSo, it was a mistake, because THAT'S what they used as an argument and nothing else. If they were lazy, ok, just say it.
But lying to the costumer it's ALWAYS a mistake.
>Also the games should have more time to be developed instead of a game per yearWe agree on this, yeah.
