>>50726367>and yet it still has worse pokemon distribution than XYX/Y give you a lot of options but those options only serve to bloat the routes with more pokemon. Realistically you're not going to use any of the 10 pokemon on most routes, and distribution of them boils down to "this is route 1, generational birds/normal types, this is a forest, bugs, this is a cave, rock types
>worse online than XYEh, neither was really better or worse, X/Y didn't exactly add anything worth doing, and online battling/trading was just as good in both games
>worse map design than XYHaha
>worse animations than XYOkay, but consider, the 3D pokemon models look fucking horrendous.
>worse performance than XYThis is just a blatant lie, on top of which XY slows down considerably when 3D is turned on. I don't use 3D, but when the main gimmick of your system is 3D and you release a 3D game on said system, you can connect those dots
>worse battle facilities than XYSo the Battle Tower, Castle, Factory, Arcade, and Hall, all combined, are worse than the Battle Maison? You're clearly just trolling at this point
>and the story/difficulty is still as dogshit as XY Creation of the world and an evil team (that uses surprisingly strong pokemon with good moves) that wants to gain control of the creators of said world in order to destroy and remake it in their image, vs boring, zero lore region and lackluster evil team that wants to do the same because the world is kinda fugly. Team Flare is a joke. Team Galactic has jokes written about them in the story. They are not the same.
>(why the FUCK do Looker and Pluto even exist? They contribute nothing literally the entire game)I like them, Looker has some funny moments, and has an air of mystery to him, sort of like Boba Fett or Darth Maul before Disney started using them all the time. I want to know more about looker.
>so I still don't see what about the game is actually supposed to be good.I'm trying really hard to care rn ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
