>>50962530Honestly don't blame her, or the girl on the right holding her shoes in
>>50962651 because I attended a wedding a while back and so many women there were in pain because of their high-heeled shoes that looked good but weren't exactly designed with comfort in mind. It makes me curious about the women who pull it off, are they pretending or do comfortable heels really exist? Lots of the girls who took their shoes off were also pretty hefty, all that weight on your toes can't be good for you. Also you can't see the shoes anyways, who gives a shit? Always thought it was dumb that girls obsess over shoes when the wedding dresses don't even showcase them because they're too long anyways. It makes more sense when the dress is shorter.
>>50962073I remember going to a shop for some formal clothes and saw a lot of the nice "designer" shoes looked a lot like casual sneakers, but they were brand name even if they weren't the typical oxfords that you usually see paired with tuxes. I kind of doubt that's the case for Joe but I think they're supposed to be a comfortable alternative that's still meant to be fancy enough to be worn with formal wear. Still looks a bit weird, but I didn't really notice until you had pointed it out. Whatever the fuck his left foot is actually doing in both the OP that that image is actually stranger.
>>50961932what the fuck
