>>51038021>And which point was that?> (one in dppt and the other in LA)>And you're okay with this one apparently fundamental part of Pokemon not being mentioned at all, ever?No, because it was mentioned. I don't need to be reminded 24/7 of shit as I don't have adhd.
Funny you're on a board where people repeat whatever poketubers say despite it having not official backing but your "problem" is that something wasn't mentioned ENOUGH. Its almost as if you don't actually care about the lore.
>PLA is clearly based of a certain time period that is well before 1925.And? Do you have the year?
>I didn't ignore your pointYes, you quite literally did. You didn't prove Pikachu is no longer an electric type.
> just pointing proof of a retconI literally never said nothing in the zukan was retconned.
However, in order to prove its absolutely not reliable at all you have to prove ALL of it was.
Otherwise you have to bring a direct shrinking retcon in order to prove it wrong about that.
>You can't just pick and choose what is and isn't canon from the zukan, I'm basing it off the actual games ,you know , a PRIMARY SOURCE of canonThe ones which, as you said, do mention shrinking you mean?
