>>51394299>>51394323>>51394330>Obviously this is not an EV training method.>Battling Pokemon and getting EVs for defeating them is not an EV training method when the Pokemon does it by itselfDo you people ever get tired of being retarded?
>>51394381>I dont understand why you being able to kill it because youre an idiot is suddenly a problemBecause now it's the Pokemon doing it, not you, all you do is send it out and it battles autonomously. Unless there's some sort of failsafe in place (which is possible, but unconfirmed at this point) your Pokemon can and likely will automatically kill shiny Pokemon without your input, which is a problem
>>51394420>Whataboutism is when you try to deflect from an issue by pointing to some other bad thing.>some other bad thingThe definition of whataboutism doesn't state another bad thing necessarily: "the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue."
Telling me that my criticism of auto-battles is moot because EV training can be done easier via other methods is whataboutism, because it appeals to an outside thing to address the complaint at hand. "EV training can be done via this other method!" Yeah? What about it? We're not talking about that, we're talking about auto-battles. I agree that it would be easier to do it that way, but that's besides the point
