>>51862005I'm not even going too approach that top. The reasoning is, while technically true, it completely ignores the ACTUAL usage of that word from the 19th and early 20th century. This does the same thing as calling those who use it was a replacement to "figuratively" wrong, as it also completely ignores the actual usage by non-scholars of the term.
Scholars do not define words, the people do.
>there should be no kiddos on 4chanYes. Here's the problem:4chan is the fucking Greek god of the internet. Pretty much EVERYONE's heard of them at this point, even the kids. They're probably going to seek 4chan out, just to see the "once largest website in the entire world". Unfortunately, the edgy world of political teenagers is also attracted by the exploits of
>>>/pol/.
To those who are not the type to check out /pol/(and some that are,) /vp/ is geared towards a game series that kids are largely familiar with. The familiarity will draw them.
As hard as it is to say this, despite our best efforts, young children are here. We should keep our shit to edgy teen stuff at maximum, and should NOT be trying to discuss shit like this.
