>>51908483> and wonky as hell proportionsFor what he was going for, proportions are fine.
> Very accurate, its even green.if he wanted to draw canon on-model thing he could, he has liek 3485y3453 on-model drawings from the past 3 years. This is why I called you a retard because you unironically do not understand the point here. He did not want do draw what he always drew.
> You can repost your earlier posts, they're still garbage. This is a poor attempt at the thing you are mentioning, and reiterating earlier posts won't suddenly swap my opinion.I'm glad we agree you have no argument
> This is an awful attempt at translating the anatomy to "realism"First of all, you again resorting to fallacy. I never aid it was full-blown realism, guess I need to repeat myself, like you do for retarded people:
> "The artist tried to have realsitic take but also did not want to stray away too much from original. So he ended up in the uncanny in-between"> Uh huh, merely cried about my "dogshit opinion".Because that what you were arguing about. I dont have value for subjective opinions. Not did I care about yours until you started to state an actual bullshit as an objective truth.
>You were arguing that OP's art eyes are literally on the frontWhy didn't you read the rest of the sentence, why stop here? Dont wanna to see I was making sensible point?
The stupidest shit you were talking about Serpentoir canon design and anatomy could be applied to picrelated because if his head shape . But what Op drew is far more close to original design OVERALL than your most retarded take that Serpentoir is essentially as close to real snake as it gets and his eyes literally on his side of his head that is a box with diametral-positioned parallel sides. The dumbest shit I've read when there is plenty of evidence with screenshots, on of which you posted yourself.
You dont have to like the OP art. That's fine. The only thing I value there is character expression and sexual appeal myself