>>51979443Duh. There's a reason I don't follow this faggot, he claims he has a source but just steals others work (and then tries to get them to gang up on people he doesn't like)
There's been a few images posted sucking his cock with the watermark so I wasn't sure if those originated from his twitter or not. Because, again, I don't follow this fag.
>>51979501This is what is getting me. I know he's not doing it himself, but he might have someone doing it for him which is ????
You know, besides not posting the other two legendaries wanting a specific number of RT/Likes/whatever.
