>>52175743>At one point the dex had to stop getting larger and implement some kind of rotation dex for new games.If this were still 2D with bespoke sprites every game, especially fully animated, then sure, but that's not the situation.
They have seemingly future-proofed 3D models and animations they've reused with minimal changes for the past decade.
>We are losing the goal of the original point here. It was about complaining about minimal things but whatever.There's nothing wrong with complaining about minimal things.
It's only a problem if someone says the game is bad entirely because of a few minimal things.
>why are you even playing this game if you hate it so muchI haven't, and probably won't.
I don't hate the game either. I'm not quite invested enough to feel that strongly about it. Plus it looks quite a bit better than SwSh, presentation aside.
Mostly, I enjoy the pokemon designs from afar rather than playing what appear in most ways to me to be aggressively mediocre games with poor presentation.
>It's one of the selling points now, like It or not. And it's never going to get better unless they reduce the dex even more.I don't see how this is true unless you're arguing specifically against every single pokemon showing up wild in the game world, rather than just being transferable and usable in battle, and I'm not sure who'd be arguing for the former other than children with no idea of scope or how much of a mess it would be trying to find any specific pokemon with 1000+ appearing.
To be clear, I'd love for this to be far more of a selling point than it is. As it is, only a few of the pokemon appear to do anything of particular interest in the world.
>How the main reason to buy any Pokemon game ever doesn't make it good on their own?People buying a thing for a particular reason doesn't make me consider it of quality.
Like, I'm not going to say the MCU is good because people buy tickets to see superheroes they recognize and like on the big screen.
