>>52463510Who conducted this study?
>P-people!!! Okay! Gah! you're so stupid!!!How did you account for IP changes? Six months is a long time and the dumbest posters tend to get banned and thus reset their I.P. more often. This means they would be counted twice.
>S-shut up!How were these post studied? Was it by AI? What key words and/or sentence structures was the AI looking for? What was the basis for why said criteria represented "logical arguments"?
>I don't...Or do you expect me to believe these data was gathered via human review? Do you know how many post are made site wide per day?
There is exactly zero chance you would be able to gather enough people to pour through 4chan post every day for 6 months to accurately and without bias arrive at any conclusion that would lead to the information shown in this graph.
>Uhh...That infographic is pretty bare-bones, I could produce something like that in 10 minuets or less.
If I did I'd obviously put boards like /pol/ and at the bottom and /sci/ at the top because I know that's what people expect, it would lend credibility to something that is otherwise complete speculation.
>...>Yoeur' jst mad becasue ummm you post on stvipid board???
