>>52534157I can see the appeal but like i said i think its a bit much, this post
>>52534111 illustrates pretty well why i think its so good, its lets you define what pokemon is for you. Are they just kids pets? Take the smallest ones, are they giant dangerous monsters? Go for the large boys, want to have big monsters but tiny cutemons? You can do that, want the inverse? Go nuts.
Its what alternate colors that shinnies could have been if the marketing department of TPC wasnt afraid of that diluting the pokemon's brand and identity. Thankfully size consistency is something that barely fucking matters for them most of the time.
>>52534278When i first heard of size differences this is what i immediately thought of.
