>>52600961That's not what it says at all
It doesnt say they "found nothing except" it just says they discovered the tera pokemon
I walk into a garage with a car parked in it
I found a $20 on the ground
"Hey what did you find in there?"
"$20!"
And by your logic the car now no longer exists because it wasnt my point of focus
>>52600929Not how it works
By saying they didnt see something you're assigning a positive action to it
They never claim they didnt see paradox pokemon, they only claim they discovered tera pokemon
All that has been always will be until it is no longer
For your claim to be true then you need them to say in the affirmative that there are no paradox mons, it's not enough to simply not hear mention of them
