/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #52810816

[5 / 1 / 4]

Anonymous Wed 28 Dec 2022 01:07:43 No.52810816 View View Reply Original Report

Would gen 1 be more interesting if Special was replaced by Special Attack and Defense covered both physical and special attacks?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Dec 2022 01:38:01 No.52811095 Report

Quoted By: >>52811806

>>52810816
>Chansey with 250/105/105 bulk
Yeah, i'm good

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Dec 2022 02:56:45 No.52811806 Report

Quoted By:

>>52811095
Chansey's base DEF is 5

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Dec 2022 03:21:18 No.52812031 Report

Quoted By: >>52812434

I don't think so. Special being a dual-purpose stat isn't ideal, but I'd much prefer that to coverage selection being based only on the attacking type and not what it hits as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Dec 2022 04:01:51 No.52812434 Report

Quoted By:

>>52810816
>>52812031
Yeah, if anything it's less interesting, because you just want to use the move that matches your better attacking stat, rather than having a physical move on an otherwise special attacker for a Chansey, for instance.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches