>>53124814No yeah I get that, and obviously by technicality Disney does not possess the singular highest grossing franchise (yet), but the Disney brand is infinitely more powerful than the Pokemon brand, and far more aggressive too, that chart people like to reference a lot really doesn't sell Disney's absolute dominance well and makes Pokemon look a lot bigger than it actually is
>>53124826>but massive gathering of pokemon-addicted retards ready to throw money at merch wasLooking at it through that lens sure, but the way it was initially worded implies competitive itself was somehow an actual major contributor to Pokemon's revenue
Also, honestly, if we're just going by "merch sales suffered due to memedemic" that applies to every franchise ever