>>53335188>Still doesn't explain the differences, as we can see the spikes clearly.Yeah it does, it's a very blurry image of a moving pokemon on an old camera.
>It's a fucking photograph,Yes, of something that's moving taken by an old camera. You're used to modern technology taking everything perfectly regardless anon. You lack that understanding of technology before your time.
>They're fakemons made real from the professor's imagination,Which doesn't make any sense otherwise they would have been perfect recreations and even if you want to take the minor Donphan differences into account they would just resemble that and not what they are if they were all just imagined.
In other words there's absolutely zero reason as to why they wouldn't be perfect 1 to 1 recreations if they were just being copied from their mind.
>I just need to you prove literally any of your claims. What claims haven't been proven?
The feet and spikes are the only difference in the sketch? Proven by your own image.
The spikes are the only difference and it's due to the blur? Proven by your own image.
What other claims did I have in this reply chain and keep in mind that my posts start here
>>53334934>>53335188>Or maybe it falls in line with what imagination theory has been saying where Heath lied about the paradox mons which is why no one can find themIf heath lied about the entire expedition then we wouldn't be able to confirm everything else in the book anon.
>I'm more than willing to be cordial about thisNo, you clearly aren't this entire time you've been nothing but stubborn unwilling to entertain any viewpoint other than your own no matter how ludicrous your ideas may be
