>>53452071>It doesNo it doesn't. You went on a complete tangent about the AI that no one mentioned.
>First, the Bootstrap doesn't work at all in violetOf course it does, it's a time machine that allows free movement through time for anything within a pokeball.
Anything more than that is headcanon, which is why it doesn't make sense to you. You're purposefully making up these situations claiming that they're the arguments of the people who are against you.
>What are the odds of the time machine magically pulling out the exact Pokemon that the artist was fantasizing about?Given the nature of time travel, assuming they were inspired by a Wake and Leaves sent to the past then the chances are 100%.
>it's a point in favor, actuallyAgainst.
The reason why is because it quite literally has no resemblance to the sketches beyond the features they share with Suicune and even those are radically different.
>We see that it's working on auto-pilot during the fight - the AI isn't touching any controls at allAnon, the fact that it can work autonomously doesn't mean that it can only work autonomously.
Using the logs you can infer that it can do BOTH.
>You're stating that jumping into the past would create a paradox, yet you say the AI is really travelling through time to the past in your own post.You were the one who brought up the AI in the first place and that part of the conversation was about the AI saving the professor, an idea you also brought up out of the blue, and not going back 200 years ago.
You shouldn't be having this much trouble following a conversation.
>From when?That doesn't even make sense as a response, they paradox mon could have come from multiple eras.
All we know is that they came to the present before going back 200 years ago.
>Why?It's going to be covered in the dlc.
