>>53563216>Says the guy who, in the previous thread, said the game's main theme was time travel.What?
Anon, there are multiple people arguing against you here and I don't think anyone other than you thinks that.
And in this very reply chain I said what the theme is.
>>53563094>It's the antithesis to the "work towards your goal" theme of the game.And it was not in fact time travel that I said.
>None of what you quoted indicates the AI would lie to you (again)I never said the AI lied.
>They knew they were a part of its main defensive program, but had no idea they were part of the Paradise Protection ProgramThey're the same thing. The PPP is a specific protocol of the defence system.
Hence why its called the Paradise Protection Protocol and not Program as you thought.
Words have meaning you know.
>anything that ISN'T in a Pokeball can't pass through.That's not even remotely close to what I and the game said. Again, i and the game said that non-Pokeball things CAN go through but they can't return.
>This confirms they and the Professor BELIEVE it's a two-way trip.The story doesn't make any sense unless it is. To bring back something through time it needs to be two way.
>You don't think getting marooned in a different point in time with no way back isn't dangerous?No, not really. If you target 10 minutes in the past/future there's zero danger unless there's a malfunction.
Also if you read your own post
>makes it obvious the AI is suicidingYou suggested physical harm.
>Do you have ANY concrete proof that it WOULDN'T destroy them,It's a time machine designed to send and retrieve things across time, not a weapon.
Do you have any evidence that it could destroy a fully mechanical body?
