>>53585926>Detective Pikachu even with joke Pikachu didn't have an ounce of fun in the entire filmAgain, your taste is proving to be absolute dogshit. It was a ton of fun.
>The plot was an aimless messIt's very much isn't, just because you're too retarded to understand it doesn't mean it's an aimless mess. It follows a guy looking for his dad and in the process following in his father's footsteps.
>trying hide the barely there storyObjectively better of a story than any of the pokemon games. Yes even your precious unova, unovabort.
>It also looked terrible because they hired the "pokemon if real" artist to make pokemon look unlike they have ever been portrayed with shit like ugly cracked skin or literal rubber ball texturesAnd they looked fine, better than anything (you) could do and better than if they just ported the DS models into a realistic setting.
>The pokemon looked like actual horrors and didn't fit the film.They fit the film great, just because you want some roger rabbit bullshit with shitty 3d models pasted unfittingly into IRL scenes doesn't make it bad. Again, your taste is shit.
>Sonic had a very basic plot but the characters were great,The characters were awful aside from Sonic and Eggman in the first one.
>Sonic 2 didn't add anything valuableIt added tails, Knuckles, the master emerald, more lore on the echidnas of the movieverse, the promise of shadow in the third movie, GUN, and Super Sonic. It took all the best parts of the first movie and amped them up to 11 and took all the shit parts and made them enjoyable.
TLDR, your taste is the problem and you sound like the retarded tasteless movie critics on rottentomatoes.
