/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #53814734

[36 / 5 / 19]

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:34:00 No.53814734 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>53814739 >>53814772 >>53814832 >>53814844 >>53814848 >>53814849 >>53814859 >>53814860 >>53814873 >>53814912 >>53814919 >>53814924 >>53814931 >>53814964

do you have a genuine reason as to why you dislike lickilicky besides "its big and fat"

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:35:02 No.53814737 Report

Quoted By:

it is a babymon that was repurposed into an evo

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:35:24 No.53814739 Report

Quoted By: >>53814770

>>53814734
they should've made the tongue way longer than lickitung's instead of making it arguably shorter

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:35:29 No.53814740 Report

Quoted By: >>53814747

bad like all gen 4 evos

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:36:37 No.53814747 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814740
Based. They should have released it in BW and made it it's own single stage mon. Then it would have a built in fanbase of retards.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:40:38 No.53814770 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814739
This.

It doesn't particularly advance Likitung in any particular way, it's... less Likitung and more just an ambiguous fat blob.
That's not to say I hate it though.
Likitung is my favorite LC mon, and this piece of shit lets that happen

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:40:54 No.53814772 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
I don't even really like Lickitung much, and this is just kinda Lickitung but uglier. That might not count as a genuine reason though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:50:25 No.53814832 Report

Quoted By: >>53814847

>>53814734
>It's bad to hate fat ugly things
You're American, right.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 0463Lickilicky.jpg, 14KiB, 226x229

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:52:21 No.53814844 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
I started to go by each part of its design and it's all terrible. All you need to do is look at the face. It's on of the worst in all Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:52:48 No.53814847 Report

Quoted By: >>53814891

>>53814832
>responding to his own greentext instead of the direct question
>doesn't know how to use a question mark
jajajaja hola familia mi amigo

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:52:51 No.53814848 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
Lickitung is already ugly, boring and weak for how rare it is in it's debut

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:53:14 No.53814849 Report

Quoted By: >>53814856

>>53814734
>do you have a genuine reason as to why you dislike lickilicky besides [genuine reason]
this kind of posts should warrant an instant ban

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:55:22 No.53814856 Report

Quoted By: >>53814864 >>53814870

>>53814849
No one ever says the problem with tyranitar is it's big and fat, or snorlax, or dozens of other fatmons.
>this kind of posts
KYS esl

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:56:36 No.53814859 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
Doesn't feel like it really iterates Lickitung in an interesting way. It could just as easily be a regional form. And of the two, Lickitung looks more interesting. So why have an evo at all?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:56:55 No.53814860 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
Looks more like a baby Lickitung than an actual evo. Not doing anything new with the tongue aspect also doesn't help. At least evos like Tangrowth(vine arms), Magmortar(arm mortars), Electivire(wire tails), etc bring something new to the table

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:57:37 No.53814864 Report

Quoted By: >>53814888

>>53814856
>No one ever says the problem with tyranitar is it's big and fat, or snorlax, or dozens of other fatmons
tyranitar isn't big and fat and the whole concept of Snorlax hinges on it being big and fact
>triggered by an extra S
back to twitter, tranny

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:58:27 No.53814870 Report

Quoted By: >>53814888

>>53814856
>No one ever says the problem with tyranitar is it's big and fat, or snorlax, or dozens of other fatmons.
because those aren't evolutions to pokemon that had existed for several gens before

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 14:58:46 No.53814873 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
I mean yes I do, but "its big and fat" on its own is more than enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:01:38 No.53814888 Report

Quoted By: >>53815176

>>53814864
>the whole concept of Snorlax hinges on it being big and fact
So? It's still big and fat.
>triggered by an extra S
It's actually "this." Yoire more retarded than first glance would indicate.
>>53814870
Irrelevant to big and fat being the issue.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:02:05 No.53814891 Report

Quoted By: >>53814900

>>53814847
You asked if there was any other reason to hate it outside of it being a fatass.
Implying that it isn't a valid reason to hate it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:05:23 No.53814900 Report

Quoted By: >>53814931

>>53814891
I didn't ask anything and that doesn't imply that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:07:58 No.53814912 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
My only beef with it is that it’s missing Lickitung’s snout desu

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:09:45 No.53814919 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
The shorter tongue and closed mouth takes back from Lickitung

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:12:55 No.53814924 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814734
Sure, plenty.

>It's big and fat, and also really ugly
>They took a relatively animalistic/monster-like concept and anthropomorphized the fuck out of it. Instead of being a cool, weird long tongue'd skink monster, it's not a fat gourmand child with a bib
>Its head shape is simplified, face emoticon-ified, and overall much simpler, which is a regression in complexity, a trait evolutions usually should increase on
>Its tail becomes less pronounced, and which is bullshit. Everyone knows monster tails are the coolest parts of monster designs.
>The shorter tongue also de-emphasizes the literal signature aspect of Lickitung's design, and makes it silhouette less stand out than it could have been.
>Not only is it less "Pocket Monster", and more "lel xD funnay" as a result of the above, but it also fails at looking like a formidable creature capable of battling. Even similar concepts, like Snorlax, still look quite capable of battle
>On that same note, it needlessly reuses existing concepts (ie, Snorlax), but just does it worse
>The progression is uninspired. "Lickitung has a tongue so what if it ate a lot and got fat LOL!" is such a boring, overly obvious, and lazy way to add an evo. Felt like they were tasked with making an evolution without actually having an interesting idea for one.
>On top of all of this, it still sucks ass statistically, so it doesnt even give Lickitung a purpose.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:14:27 No.53814931 Report

Quoted By: >>53814955

>>53814900
>>53814734
>do you have a genuine reason as to why you dislike lickilicky besides "its big and fat"
>implying that "big and fat" isn't a "genuine reason"
>also no question mark
Hmm.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:20:12 No.53814955 Report

Quoted By: >>53814999

>>53814931
Why would a regular sentence need a question mark?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1681545422267793.jpg, 120KiB, 885x1280

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:21:56 No.53814964 Report

Quoted By: >>53815024

>>53814734
>besides "its big and fat"
That's the only genuine reason you need.
>>>/fit/fph

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1673520376507519.png, 1MiB, 749x685

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:24:47 No.53814977 Report

Quoted By: >>53815024

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:31:54 No.53814999 Report

Quoted By: >>53815008

>>53814955
"Do you have...?" is a question, my Mexican-American friend.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:34:31 No.53815008 Report

Quoted By:

>>53814999
Yeah, and that's not me. So what's your point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:38:07 No.53815024 Report

Quoted By: >>53815098

>>53814964
>>53814977
is this now officially a fph thread?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1674782891462975.png, 64KiB, 819x334

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:50:49 No.53815098 Report

Quoted By:

>>53815024

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 15:53:16 No.53815116 Report

Quoted By:

>ctrl-f "vore"
>0 results
huh, that's odd

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 16:06:20 No.53815176 Report

Quoted By: >>53815217

>>53814888
>the whole concept of Snorlax hinges on it being big and fact
you misquoted the word "fat", that means I too get to treat you like an ESL retard and disregard everything you say
>It's actually "this." Yoire more retarded than first glance would indicate.
"this kind of post" is also correct, and you mispelled "You're", ESL retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 16:12:46 No.53815217 Report

Quoted By: >>53815225

>>53815176
>no u
The ESLs final form.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 May 2023 16:14:31 No.53815225 Report

Quoted By:

>>53815217
>can dish it but can't take it
back to twitter, snowflake

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches