>>53831341allright so like
following this logic, would you say the same holds true for example, for ivysaur in relationship to bulbasaur?
ivysaur is just a bigger, meaner looking bulbasaur with its bulb open and slight differences in color palette
but theres nothing wrong with that, and everyone knows that
i know its not exactly the same with paradox mon, im not stupid, i just wanna see how you'd get yourself out of that comparison
>bulbasaur and ivysaur are part of the same evolutionary family and thus the similarities are justifiedwell, nobody is denying great tusk doesnt use donphan as a base and cross-generational evolutions have been a thing since gen 2, this one is just another kind of relationship
and i know i gave bulbasaur and ivysaurs' relationship as an example, but im sure anyone could come up with pokemon evolutions that change even less
