>>53947968Multiple Pokemon are just modified animals, this is an asinine way to approach something. Animal reference is relevant to an extent; in the same way as most other cartoons.
Additionally shit like dragons are also just a deformation of animal features as well.
You don't need "high level" anatomy down but running around with no skill in anatomy in regards to creatures will mean your skillset is lobsided and overall super limited.
And I don't mean "limited to drawing pokemon" I mean "limited to very specific subjects involving those pokemon". Having an understanding of a general appoximation of what Pokemon are going for allows a greater range of utilization of pokemon.
Relying solely on pokemon will run into a brick wall, as a simplified version of something is hard to parse context from. Even if it is visually pleasing.
Course don't be a retard and fuse real life animal proportions to Pokemon. That always looks pretty disgusting.
