>>53977328>Why even pretend you only ever blamed then when you literally say the imaginary "shills" stopped you in the same post?Because the previous post said " beat an enemy that exists mainly in your imagination" implying all the enemies were imaginary and, per your own admition("only ever blamed them" imploes they did get blame), the enemies include GF and TPC. So in order for
>>53975216 to properly make sense GF and TPC have to be imaginary.
They were the only enemy, no one else should've stood between BBND and GF/TPC unless they had something to gain from the policy change.
Yet, people, theoretically otuside GF/TPC did meddle in and when asked what this benefit was, even after 4 years, even in this very thread, no one could answer.
Now, it'd be incredibly retarded to defend a product that isn't benefiting you in any way, but its a bit less retarded if you get money from it. So, in the better faith possible, its assummed this is the case. But if you like being called retarded we can do that too. Unless you can finaly provide the answer and explain why it hasn't been given in 4 years of course.
