[35 / 2 / 28]
Quoted By: >>54068140 >>54068148 >>54068189 >>54068200 >>54068201 >>54068230 >>54068246 >>54068261 >>54068327 >>54068346 >>54068387 >>54068462 >>54068499 >>54068926 >>54069043 >>54069901 >>54069905 >>54069917
If you had to remove three typings (not the pokemon themselves, they get reclassified) which would they be?
My vote would be:
>Fighting type (too vague/nebulous)
>Dragon type (opposite problem, weirdly specific and inconsistently used since Gen1, see Charizard)
>Normal type (similar to Fighting but possibly worse, seems like a copout type for when GF can't think of what type to make a 'mon)
My vote would be:
>Fighting type (too vague/nebulous)
>Dragon type (opposite problem, weirdly specific and inconsistently used since Gen1, see Charizard)
>Normal type (similar to Fighting but possibly worse, seems like a copout type for when GF can't think of what type to make a 'mon)
