>>54118061stop moving the goalpost and read the post
the argument is that we cannot infer anything conclusive based on the graph posted here
>>54116871 because
a. it doesn't indicate what age groups are playing what games
b. there's no way to account for users who have lied about their ages, which is something kids and teenagers have done since the earliest days of the internet
>The kids are more prevalent on the TCGnot even slightly relevant to this discussion, which is about how many people are buying and playing the mainline games and how the graphic posted above cannot be used to make any assumptions about this information in case you forgot
>GOsee previous
>The switch sales stats reflect thispost an example that actually demonstrates this in any way
>whether you like it or notyou're the one trying to change the argument, in case you forgot
