>>54138143Some still implies they exist, instead of what you said here
>>54138093 which implies that no 15 year old could ever have C Cups simply because they are underaged. It's a ridiculous notion and train of logic that you've already backtracked on entirely.
With that said, I'm not trying to fuck some 15 year old, just pointing out your stupid ass logic in a stupid ass thread. Have a nice day though, and thanks for conceding so easily.
