>>54172330>ahh putting words in my mouth aren't we? when did i said blaziken looks good without the fire? i just said it's better with the fire learn to argue AND read pleaseyou saying blaziken is "better" with the fire implies it's already good without it. If you wanted to say that fire-less blaziken was bad, you'd say blaziken is "good" with the fire, not "better". Clearly this is a nuance of the english language that flew right over your ESL wetback brain so consider this a free lesson.
>You might have half braincell left if you think you can compare a starter with a random fire shitmon I can compare a good design you think is bad to a shit design you think is good to display how shit your taste is, yes.
>jobmons is a retarded term none of them has a jobretard cannot comprehend language that isn't literal, more news at 11
