>>54263536>Library-Chan or whatever was obviously baitingShe was on /vp/ for years.
>someone was simply pretending to be Library-Chan and doing that so people think it TamaDoesn't make sense. Tama's actions came after and coincided with what Library was doing. Not the other way around.
>There literally 0 credible evidenceThere's is but you're ignoring it.
>nobody talks about it either. You can look in the archives and see everyone knew it was bullshit.Wrong. There were a few people that were questioning it but the majority agreed that Library-chan was Tama. And people still talk about it. Not as much because Library-chan isn't so active here anymore and Tama threads get deleted by mods but still. Last year we literally had a bump limit thread about Tama's Cloyster. A thread with Tama's pussy as the OP! And people were discussing about how she's Library-chan.
