>>54465800>Ignoring canonwhat fucking canon? people having sexual relationships with their mons is canon? as in, it was stated in any way, shape or form anywhere? stop using your weirdo delusions as part of your argument, the fact that you're getting so defensive just speaks volumes about who's the real dogfucker here. doesn't matter how """human""" they're represented, even in PMD; you're basically admitting that it's fine for a human to have sex with something that looks like an animal.
what's even more fucked about this is that, as another anon said, your mind has been so rotten by porn that a human and a pokemon having affection for each other means "THEY'RE IN LOVE WITH EACH OTHER!!! THEY TOTALLY FUCK!!!!!!!!!!".
i'm done with you sickos, go get yourself checked