>>54504959>You can absolutely say that when the game has many subtle hints that it may not actually be time travel.Anon, there are no subtle hints saying otherwise and even if there was there's no evidence for magical wish granting.
Like I said everyone's desire was fulfilled through hard work.
Nemona
stalked you into being her perfect rival.
You and Arven hunted down the Herba Mystica.
Penny and Team Star stopped their bullying problem with their own plan
The professor and her team built the time machine.
>The game is only literal when it supports my ideas and ambiguous when it doesn’t.What? Anon, there's literal sentences and then there's subtext. None of them support the imagination theory.
>It’s a continuation of a story that established to our knowledge they don’t exist in Area Zero. Now they’re existing, despite the Time Machine being gone. The time machine isn't gone, it was shut down but completely functional.
With this point it doesn't really matter what explanation you go with because in both imagination and time travel the time machine is essential to the appearance of of paradoxes being a 3d printer for them in the former. You have to accept that it's going to be reactivated regardless.
>Except they treat Wake/Leaves as something that’s not been discovered before They don't. There's no information about them in game.
By that same logic Charizard and the other mightiest mark mon were being treated as a pokemon that was never discovered before as well since they don't have dex entries or mentions in game.
You need to use some logic here anon.
>You’re choosing to just dismiss the lineAnon, I'm saying you can't disregard the line before that goes into far more detail and alludes to something that can happen with a time machine.
You're basically saying it doesn't count because the character says
>oh I don't get it!One is a throwaway line that's in line with character, the other is blatant foreshadowing.
