>>54614116>they're just named "paradox pokémon", not "time-paradox pokémon", they don't need to be originated from a time paradox.One, It's literally a story about time travel and a common trope in them is a time paradox. Use some critical thinking skills, if the game hammers home that it's time travel the paradox is a time paradox.
Two, you're ignoring the fact that Arven is pointing out a specific kind of time paradox.
>paradox mon just traveled from the ancient past/far future to the present. For some reason unknown they were spotted during Heath expedition (unless he made that up). Considering this information, where do you spot a time paradox?Are you being serious right now?
The paradox is that they can't have been pulled into the present without the professor being inspired by the book and the book can't exist without the professor pulling them in to the present to be sent into the past.
It's a time loop without a beginning or end and that's what makes it a paradox.
Almost every single piece of sci-fi media has done a basic bootstrap paradox before off the top of my head I can name Sonic the Comic where sonic gives himself a time stone in order to find the same time stone to give to himself to create the loop and in futurama when Fry becomes his own grandfather.
The problem here is that you think there's only one kind of paradox, most likely the universe explodes one, when there are many different kinds.
But let me guess, this is where you go
>but how could the professor do it?When they were never the only one working on the time machine.
