>>54627153>then you're illiterateI understood your argument, I didn't engage with it because it's not something that actually happens.
I don't know any giga-nerd that knows every possible move of every generation of every pokemon (because he's not using the hack wiki so he can't know what pokemon he'll go against he has to know this for every pokemon), and instantly his enjoyment of the game goes out the window if a pokemon uses a move his carefully crafted strategy that takes in mind 100+ moves didn't account for.
I don't know any because that person doesn't exist and you're making this argument in bad faith.
As for the "moot point" part, you don't seem too smart so I'll try to explain it with simpler words.
Totem pokemon start fights with buffs, which you can't do unless you hack.
Eternatus eternamax is a pokemon you can't get unless you hack.
You still fight them. This is called an "asymmetric fight", because enemies use strategies you don't have access to. This is something that is in most RPG's, and most video games. Symmetrical fights are the exception, actually.
Why do you only complain when trainers have movesets you can't access?
Or closer to the point, why do you want every fight to be symmetrical in a strategy game where your opponent is an idiot that can't utilize resources effectively?
