>>55005706>why are they labeled as Paradox Pokemon in the Pokedex?Because they're part of the very obvious time paradox I mentioned in the previous post.
>Why label them as something they aren't and continue to label them as the incorrect thing?Many pokemon are classified after something they relate to, a feature, action, origin, role in the story.
Mewtwo for instance is the "Genetic" Pokemon, a classification far more outlandish than paradox.
And before you say something absurdly wrong like
>BUT MEWTWO WAS EXPERIMENTED ON IT FITS! It would be more accurate to name it after the actual experiment in this case it should be called the "spliced" pokemon.
Another wrong one is Jirachi which is called the "wish" pokemon but has never actually granted any wishes, it's just the myth associated with it.
Hedging your bets on such a stupid idea without realising that "paradox" is actually one of the more accurate classifications for pokemon just shows how far gone you are.
>Shouldn't we have seen a proper change to "Ancient/Future Pokemon" in marketing after the TCG and TPCi's writeup for the Walking Wake/Iron Leaves event raid?The entire generation was and still is themed around the idea of past and future. You can't possibly be this blind.
